TY - JOUR
T1 - Analytical issues in the study of verb–noun compounds
T2 - How does Akan fit in?
AU - Appah, Clement Kwamina Insaidoo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - This paper highlights three issues in the study of verb–noun compounding and shows how data from Akan (Niger-Congo, Kwa, Ghana) help answer the relevant questions for the language. The issues, which mainly concern the exocentric subtype, are: one, the syntactic category of the left-hand constituent and that of the whole compound; two, whether the formation of verb–noun compounds is a matter of syntax or morphology; and three, how to distinguish between verb–noun compounds and verb phrases, given their structural similarity. Although these issues have come up somehow in the literature on Akan verb–noun compounds, they have not been deliberately targeted for discussion. This paper fills the gap. It is shown that the left-hand constituent is definitely a verb. This raises the question of how to account for the syntactic category of the exocentric subclass of the compound, given that the compound is not a hyponym of the right-hand nominal constituent whose syntactic category may be assumed to percolate to the whole. It is also argued that, per the criteria in the literature, the formation of Akan verb–noun compounds has to be a matter of morphology and not syntax. Finally, it is shown that there are formal and semantic basis for distinguishing verb–noun compounds from verb phrases in Akan.
AB - This paper highlights three issues in the study of verb–noun compounding and shows how data from Akan (Niger-Congo, Kwa, Ghana) help answer the relevant questions for the language. The issues, which mainly concern the exocentric subtype, are: one, the syntactic category of the left-hand constituent and that of the whole compound; two, whether the formation of verb–noun compounds is a matter of syntax or morphology; and three, how to distinguish between verb–noun compounds and verb phrases, given their structural similarity. Although these issues have come up somehow in the literature on Akan verb–noun compounds, they have not been deliberately targeted for discussion. This paper fills the gap. It is shown that the left-hand constituent is definitely a verb. This raises the question of how to account for the syntactic category of the exocentric subclass of the compound, given that the compound is not a hyponym of the right-hand nominal constituent whose syntactic category may be assumed to percolate to the whole. It is also argued that, per the criteria in the literature, the formation of Akan verb–noun compounds has to be a matter of morphology and not syntax. Finally, it is shown that there are formal and semantic basis for distinguishing verb–noun compounds from verb phrases in Akan.
KW - Akan
KW - Compositionality
KW - Syntactic category
KW - Verb phrase
KW - Verb–noun compound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064386297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1556/2062.2019.66.1.1
DO - 10.1556/2062.2019.66.1.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85064386297
SN - 2559-8201
VL - 66
SP - 1
EP - 29
JO - Acta Linguistica Academica
JF - Acta Linguistica Academica
IS - 1
ER -