Airborne volatile organic compounds at an e-waste site in Ghana: Source apportionment, exposure and health risks

Nan Lin, Lawrencia Kwarteng, Christopher Godwin, Sydni Warner, Thomas Robins, John Arko-Mensah, Julius N. Fobil, Stuart Batterman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Informal e-waste recycling processes emit various air pollutants. While there are a number of pollutants of concern, little information exists on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) releases at e-waste sites. To assess occupational exposures and estimate health risks, we measured VOC levels at the Agbogbloshie e-waste site in Ghana, the largest e-waste site in Africa, by collecting both fixed-site and personal samples for analyzing a wide range of VOCs. A total of 54 VOCs were detected, dominated by aliphatic and aromatic compounds. Mean and median concentrations of the total target VOCs were 46 and 37 μg/m3 at the fixed sites, and 485 and 162 μg/m3 for the personal samples. Mean and median hazard ratios were 2.1 and 1.4, respectively, and cancer risks were 4.6 × 10-4 and 1.5 × 10-4. These risks were predominantly driven by naphthalene and benzene; chloroform and formaldehyde were also high in some samples. Based on the VOC composition, the major sources were industry, fuel evaporation and combustion. The concentration gradient across sites and the similarity of VOC profiles indicated that the e-waste site emissions reached neighboring communities. Our results suggest the need to protect e-waste workers from VOC exposure, and to limit emissions that can expose nearby populations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number126353
JournalJournal of Hazardous Materials
Volume419
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Oct 2021

Keywords

  • E-waste
  • Exposure
  • Health risk
  • Source apportionment
  • Volatile organic compounds

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Airborne volatile organic compounds at an e-waste site in Ghana: Source apportionment, exposure and health risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this