TY - JOUR
T1 - A SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid ELISA represents a low-cost alternative to lateral flow testing for community screening in LMI countries
AU - Humbert, Maria Victoria
AU - Opurum, Precious Chinonyerem
AU - Brendish, Nathan J.
AU - Poole, Stephen
AU - He, Peijun
AU - Katis, Ioannis
AU - Quaye, Jerry
AU - Bediako, Yaw
AU - Duriez, Patrick Jacques
AU - Eason, Robert W.
AU - Sones, Collin
AU - Quaye, Osbourne
AU - Awandare, Gordon A.
AU - Christodoulides, Myron
AU - Clark, Tristan W.
AU - Quashie, Peter K.
AU - McCormick, Christopher J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The British Infection Association
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background Controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 is problematic because of transmission driven by asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic individuals. Community screening can help identify these individuals but is often too expensive for countries with limited health care resources. Low-cost ELISA assays may address this problem, but their use has not yet been widely reported. Methods We developed a SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid ELISA and assessed its diagnostic performance on nose and throat swab samples from UK hospitalised patients and sputum samples from patients in Ghana. Results The ELISA had a limit of detection of 8.4 pg/ml antigen and 16 pfu/ml virus. When tested on UK samples (128 positive and 10 negative patients), sensitivity was 58.6% (49.6–67.2) rising to 78.3% (66.7–87.3) if real-time PCR Ct values > 30 were excluded, while specificity was 100% (69.2–100). In a second trial using the Ghanaian samples (121 positive, 96 negative), sensitivity was 52% (42.8–61.2) rising to 72.6% (61.8–81.2) when a > 30 Ct cut-off was applied, while specificity was 100% (96.2–100). Conclusions: Our data show that nucleocapsid ELISAs can test a variety of patient sample types while achieving levels of sensitivity and specificity required for effective community screening. Further investigations into the opportunities that this provides are warranted.
AB - Background Controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 is problematic because of transmission driven by asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic individuals. Community screening can help identify these individuals but is often too expensive for countries with limited health care resources. Low-cost ELISA assays may address this problem, but their use has not yet been widely reported. Methods We developed a SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid ELISA and assessed its diagnostic performance on nose and throat swab samples from UK hospitalised patients and sputum samples from patients in Ghana. Results The ELISA had a limit of detection of 8.4 pg/ml antigen and 16 pfu/ml virus. When tested on UK samples (128 positive and 10 negative patients), sensitivity was 58.6% (49.6–67.2) rising to 78.3% (66.7–87.3) if real-time PCR Ct values > 30 were excluded, while specificity was 100% (69.2–100). In a second trial using the Ghanaian samples (121 positive, 96 negative), sensitivity was 52% (42.8–61.2) rising to 72.6% (61.8–81.2) when a > 30 Ct cut-off was applied, while specificity was 100% (96.2–100). Conclusions: Our data show that nucleocapsid ELISAs can test a variety of patient sample types while achieving levels of sensitivity and specificity required for effective community screening. Further investigations into the opportunities that this provides are warranted.
KW - Diagnosis
KW - ELISA
KW - Nucleocapsid
KW - SARS-cov-2
KW - Test
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117191371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.08.049
DO - 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.08.049
M3 - Article
C2 - 34606784
AN - SCOPUS:85117191371
SN - 0163-4453
VL - 84
SP - 48
EP - 55
JO - Journal of Infection
JF - Journal of Infection
IS - 1
ER -